|
Number 25, September 6, 2005 | ||
|
|||
As we move into fall 2005, we expect activity in both the House of Representatives and the Senate on reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. In brief, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce has passed its major reauthorization bill, H.R. 609, and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee has introduced its major reauthorization bill to be considered at a mark-up session currently scheduled for September 8, 2005. Where We Stand in the House of Representatives The attached chart compares current law to accreditation-related and other provisions of H.R. 609 as reported by the Committee. It addresses the following topics: distance education, transfer of credit, information to the public, due process, missions of religious institutions, states as accreditors, governance, student achievement, and intellectual pluralism and student speech. Discussions continue about various amendments, including, for example, an amendment related to inculcation of religious values. We anticipate that H.R. 609 will receive additional consideration by the House committee during the week of September 12, 2005. |
|||
Where We are Going in the Senate A preliminary examination of the accreditation provisions in Part H of the Senate bill indicates that there are no separate standards for distance education; there is language about religious missions, but not inculcation of religious values; the CHEA Transfer Principle and publication of a transfer policy are included; student achievement now includes a permissive section on other student performance information; due process provisions now include opportunity for written response from the institution and an opportunity for appeal to a panel that has members other than the members of the accreditation decision making body; there is language about findings related to accreditation and reaffirmation of accreditation to be made available to the public and the Secretary. Other sections of the bill impose quite significant additional reporting and other obligations on institutions. For example, there are provisions related to transfer of credit that require objective criteria for transfer, evidence of students' transfer proficiency and reporting on percentages of students who have successfully transferred. |
|||
Next... CHEA will keep you advised of developments related to accreditation and reauthorization. And, we will provide an analysis of the Senate bill following the Senate mark-up. As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions. |
|||
|
This Update will inform interested parties on developments in the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (HEA). Please direct any inquiries or comments to chea@chea.org or to (202) 955-6126. Copyright 2005, Council for Higher Education Accreditation. All rights reserved. |