|
Number 20, May 4, 2005 | |
|
Senate Committee begins HEA Three months after the new Congress convened, approximately 100 national higher education organizations were invited on two days notice to meet on April 15 with staff members representing the 20 Senators on the Committee. The staff directions from the Senators emphasized bipartisan cooperation in the HELP Committee and a fresh start on the HEA reauthorization. This would differ sharply from the HEA work in the House. At the April 15 discussion, the HELP staff laid out their operational plans for reauthorization and asked for views on issues from the group. Staff members were firm in their plans to complete work at the committee level by the end of June. Staff made several other key procedural points. Written views of constituents should be submitted electronically and will be distributed to the entire staff. Once their bipartisan bill text is released, staff want comments specific to the legislative text by page and line number. They will start with the existing law, not from any prior bill in the Senate or the House. There was no indication when the bill would be released. The higher education groups, including CHEA, responded that they want to work with the Senators and their staff members. Over 30 speakers summarized the views on HEA of their respective organizations. The full set of expressed views covered every major conflict within the higher education community on the HEA. Accreditation topics were mentioned several times, but not in a contentious way. |
||
|
There are four major constraints on rapid Senate action. First, HEA issues are inherently difficult, as shown by the last two years of wrangling in the House. Second, HEA deliberations take time; the Act is a large bill with major constituent interests and many competing ideas for changes in the law. Third, federal budget limits might preclude maintaining the current funding levels for student aid programs, where the federal costs grow each year with increased participation under the current law. And fourth, the HELP Committee also has many other bills to address, both in education and the other areas of its broad jurisdiction. Past practice also suggests that the June timeline might not be met. A more typical legislative pace would be a year or more between bill introduction and completion of committee considerations, known formally as "reporting the bill" to the full Senate. No comprehensive Senate bill has been made public or introduced. In the seven major reauthorizations since the original HEA of 1965, the Senate Committee has never moved its bill before the House was well along with its version. Notwithstanding these constraining elements and past practices, the committee can move if a majority of members want to do so. With a bipartisan approach, a majority should be easy to assemble. The question is: Can they agree on the whole HEA in a short time within the constraints facing the committee? |
||
|
|
||
|
This Update will inform interested parties on developments in the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (HEA). It was prepared by Gregory Fusco, Vice President for Government and Public Affairs at the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEAŽ). Please direct any inquiries or comments to fusco@chea.org or to (202) 955-6126. |
||